Every time there is an award ceremony someone is always upset their favorite book/movie/president didn’t win and then whines about how it’s unfair, how the real winner was robbed, or how, clearly, the judges wouldn’t know a winner if it bit them in the ass.
This isn’t gonna be like that.
The ALA 2009 Youth Media Awards wew announced this morning at the ALA mid-winter conference in Denver, an event akin to the Academy Awards for the kidlit world, though nowhere near as brash. In a simple ceremony that lasted under an hour (Motion Picture Academy, are you listening?) the American Library Association doled out its annual awards for the Caldecott Medal, the Newbery, and all the others people may (or may not) have heard of. As always, there was buzz and speculation leading up to the event where the winning and honorable mentions are announced in breathless anticipation to a room full of librarians and an internet full of interested parites. And as always there were surprises among the expected.
I’m not going to recount the winners here, nor is this going to become a political discussion about what did, didn’t, or should have won. After a trip to my local indie bookstore, some careful consideration, and a shower I have come to see as clear as the morning air how these awards need to be fixed. Fixed implies there’s something broken, and there is.
When the awards are announced there are very few people who know in advance which books are even under consideration. Publishers may get an inkling that something is up when calls are placed the day before on behalf of the committees asking for the contact information of an author so they can be, uh, contacted. So outside of the committee members the first notion that a book is about to win trickles through less that 24 hours in advance. That means that even the most ambitious of publishers isn’t really going to get a head start on priming warehouses for demand and sending books back to press.
This is key, because what happens is that on the day the awards are announced few booksellers have a majority of the winners on the shelves, much less in quantity. There then comes the mad scramble to secure books from distributors, or calls placed on print runs, and a fickle buying public becomes too impatient to wait for something they want right then. Interest in books wane, and then a book buying public just assumes to wait until a paperback edition with a little foil emblem appears or their local library finally gets a copy.
But there are solutions.
1. Announce the shortlist a month in advance
Hollywood doesn’t get a lot right, but they understand how to make Awards work for them. They announce their shortlist a month in advance of their ceremony, which gives studios time to flood movies back into theatres and wring some more money out of them. They create interest, and people like to feel as informed as the Academy in these things. Then, when the winner is announced, they can argue the merits, agree or disagree, and generally feel like they were part of the experience.
If the ALA were to toss out a shortlist of TEN titles for each category six weeks in advance of their mid-winter conference, publishers would have a heads-up AND the opportunity to reposition these books for holiday sales. What’s key here is that by announcing the titles up front they generate interest in titles for time on both sides of the award, where now they only score that interest after the fact. Publishers, librarians, distributors, and booksellers would then be able to help guide readers (and buyers) toward titles that have been pre-selected as possibly the best in the field. This isn’t as easy to do after the fact.
With books in stock up to the day of the announcement, booksellers are then able to best capitalize on the awards and keep customers happy, rather than sending them away feeling like a book that wasn’t available was too obscure to be on hand. This perception cannot be underscored enough, because if a consumer goes into a store unsure of an unfamiliar title to begin with and they discover it is not available they will be less inclined to seek it out. Conversely, studies have shown that if a person puts an item in their hand (or has one put there for them by a bookseller) they will be something like 70% more likely to purchase it. Say what you will about the noble art of reading, books and publishing is also still a business and anything that encourages sales encourages reading and vice versa.
The reason for ten titles is so that the ALA can still award a winner and three or four (or five) honor titles and still maintain some mystery around which book will win. It also generates controversy about those that don’t, because controversy is still talk, and talk is like advertising, and books could use all the PR they can get.
2. Drag the president into the fray
Why do the winners of the Super Bowl and the World Series get to meet the president and book award winners do not? Why can’t the president make a public acknowledgment of the shortlist in advance and then meet personally with the winners in a public ceremony with the press as part of his platform on literacy? I don’t have the pull or the president’s ear, but someone has to, and for a guy who featured families reading to their kids at least three times in his paid political announcement it doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibilities for this Obama guy. Seriously, what’s the cost of something like this? Nothing? And what does it do for reading and publishing to have a president give the same amount of face time to writers of children’s books as he will for overpaid sports “heroes?”
No, I’m not kidding. I was working in a bookstore when Oprah’s magazine debuted and there was a small, one-paragraph article about a book called The Four Agreements among all the ads and fluff. That mention in her magazine generated over half a million sales of that book in one week following that mention. Prior to that the book hadn’t sold fifty-thousand copies in its previous two years. That kind of power can be scary in the wrong hands but so far the big O has used her powers for good and not evil.
So why not a Oprah Book Club for kids, an O Jr.? She could give some kidlit authors the same coverage she gives to jokers like James Frey and be promoting literacy at the same time. Once a month she throws out some quality fiction for middle grade, YA, and picture book readers. Then in the early part of the new year she does a show (or magazine feature) on the books nominated for the pending awards. Instant interest, books flying off shelves, and more importantly, young people reading.
Ten years ago if I could have traveled into the future of today I would have slapped myself for saying such a thing, but Oprah cannot be ignored. She has proven herself to be a champion of books and despite what anyone might think of the person, the advocate for reading that is Oprah cannot be denied.
It doesn’t seem likely that any of these three fixes will be put into place, but any one alone would be almost enough to send a seismic ripple through the publishing world in a good way. Set aside the question about whether or not books or ebooks are the future of publishing, there will be no future without readers and the place to generate that interest should come from those most passionately concerned about literacy.
For those intersted in the results of today’s announcement you can go to the ALA’s unfriendly site and sort through the individual winners here, or sit through the entire webcast, or just wait a few months until the books finally arive at your local bookstore with their little foil medallions attached. If you still care.